🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's parliament members have decided to withdraw from an global treaty created to protect females from violence, including domestic abuse, following prolonged and heated discussions in the parliament.

Several thousand of protesters assembled in Riga this week to oppose the decision. The ultimate authority now lies with President Edgars Rinkevics, who must decide whether to endorse or reject the legislation.

Referred to as the Istanbul Convention, the international accord only took effect in Latvia last twelve months ago, requiring governments to develop legal frameworks and assistance programs to eliminate all forms of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the first EU country to begin the process of exiting from the convention. Turkey withdrew in 2021, a decision that rights groups described as a major regression for women's rights.

Ideological Controversy and Opposition

The treaty was ratified by the European Union in last year, yet conservative factions have contended that its focus on gender equality undermines traditional families and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy debate in the Saeima, MPs decided by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the convention, a action sponsored by political opponents but backed by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a setback for centre-right Prime Minister Evika Silina, who joined demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will continue fighting so that violence will not prevail," she stated to the assembly.

Political Disagreements and Responses

One of the primary parties advocating for the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose leader has urged citizens to select from what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with multiple sexes".

Latvia's ombudswoman Karina Palkova urged the treaty not to be politicized, while the group the rights organization stated it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it was an instrument to realize them".

The Thursday's decision has provoked widespread outcry both within Latvia and internationally.

22,000 people have signed a national appeal calling for the treaty to be preserved. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has announced a demonstration for next Thursday, charging MPs of disregarding the wishes of the Latvian people.

International Worries and Possible Future Actions

The leader of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly stated that the Baltic state had made a hasty choice fueled by misinformation. He described it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying step backward for female equality and human rights in the continent".

He added that since Turkey left the treaty four years ago, instances of gender-based killings and abuse targeting females had risen sharply.

Because the decision did not secure a two-thirds support, the head of state could potentially send back the legislation for further review if he has objections.

President the national leader announced on social media that he would assess the decision according to constitutional requirements, "taking into account governmental and judicial factors, instead of ideological or political viewpoints".

Recently, another member of the governing alliance, the reformist party, suggested it would not rule out petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a concerning development for gender equality not only in Latvia but across Europe," commented a rights activist.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been rising in multiple European nations
• The European treaty mandates particular legal protections for survivors of gender-based violence
• Latvia's decision could affect comparable discussions in other member states