🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking connections viewing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of respondents praising your insights on growing your business? Are headhunters reaching out to explore collaborations?

If not, the explanation might be your gender.

The Experiment: Modifying Profile Gender for Better Visibility

Numerous women participated in an organized LinkedIn experiment recently after popular discussions indicated that changing their gender to "male" boosted their network presence.

Some participants rewrote their profiles to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" language - inserting action-focused professional jargon like "drive", "transform" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their exposure similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether an inherent sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm favors men who employ online business jargon.

Like many large social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to decide which posts appear to which members - promoting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

Through a blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding content distribution. Instead, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how content are received.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not influence how your content shows up in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", reported remarkable outcomes.

"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she commented.

Another professional, a communications strategist, began experimenting after observing her audience decrease significantly.

The Method

• Initially, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her professional summary using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she repurposed previous content with comparable "agentic" language

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in visibility within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the success, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my content were more personal - concise and clever, but also warm and human," she stated. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - like a white male being overly confident."

She abandoned the test after seven days, saying "Each day I persisted, and outcomes got better, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Some participants experienced positive results. One writer who modified both her profile gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" described a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in particular situations or why," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These tests coincide with continuing conversations about LinkedIn's unique role as both a professional network and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently caused female creators experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in informal experiments where identical posts by men and women received vastly different reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to classify and distribute posts based on various elements, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

Company representative proposed that recent declines in some users' reach might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Changing Landscape

As one participant noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and less controlled."